Welcome to ISAserver.org
Forums |
Register |
Login |
My Profile |
Inbox |
RSS
|
My Subscription |
My Forums |
Address Book |
Member List |
Search |
FAQ |
Ticket List |
Log Out
Direct Access List Ignored
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
Login | |
|
Direct Access List Ignored - 12.Dec.2007 2:37:40 PM
|
|
|
apolloth
Posts: 14
Joined: 31.Aug.2004
Status: offline
|
We were recently required to use an application that, for whatever reason, doesn't get along with our ISA 2004 authentication. A logical step is to add the destination to the direct access list, which I've done. It doesn't seem to make any difference. I have confirmed that a PC loaded with the FWC and browser settings cannot connect with a "Proxy authentication required" error. If I disable proxy settings in IE it can connect, but our environment needs both. I've aded the site to the domains list (using several different formats including *.domain.com/*), updated the firewall client, rebooted, deleted wpad locally, setup autoconfig via GPO, disabled FWC and or browser settings etc. I can't seem to bypass the proxy config using direct access no matter what configuration I try. Any ideas? It all makes perfect sense. It just doesn't work. It appears to be ignoring the direct access list. Do I need a coresponding rule? I've got 'em, cause it works withotu browser settings. Any info is appreciated. Apolloth
|
|
|
|
RE: Direct Access List Ignored - 14.Dec.2007 4:00:32 AM
|
|
|
ianfermo
Posts: 234
Joined: 7.Nov.2004
From: Zamboanga, Philippines
Status: offline
|
Hi, Can you just create a rule allowing all to that destination/site. Usually JAVA applications does not like authenticated rule for some reason. Just make it anonymous. Hope it helps Cheers...
|
|
|
|
RE: Direct Access List Ignored - 14.Dec.2007 2:14:21 PM
|
|
|
apolloth
Posts: 14
Joined: 31.Aug.2004
Status: offline
|
I did create a rule allowing all traffic to that particular URL. I gave all users permissions, however that doesn't fix my issue with the direct access list. I would rather get this working instead of creating rules for every app/connection. In the end the rule worked. I first re-wrote the web app as a desktop app to use the current user permissions, but this wasn't a long term solution. I ended up using the rule instead and locking it down as much as possible. If anybody has any ideas about why the direct access list approach isn't working I'd appreciate any info. Apolloth
|
|
|
|
RE: Direct Access List Ignored - 19.Dec.2007 9:10:02 AM
|
|
|
abqtech
Posts: 216
Joined: 9.Mar.2004
Status: offline
|
do you need the firewall client to direct the requests to the ISA Server (firewall client control channel)? or do you want this particular traffic off of your ISA Server all together? I can help with either, but need to know which route you need to go. Please advise.
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|