Welcome to ISAserver.org

OWA 2003 Publishing

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [ISA 2006 Publishing] >> Exchange Publishing >> OWA 2003 Publishing

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

OWA 2003 Publishing - 11.May2008 5:19:18 PM

shraneel

Posts: 3
Joined: 12.Jan.2007
Status: offline

Hello

Scenario:
Have 2 Exchange 2003 on a domain. Exch1 is Master and Exch2 Member Exchange. Both servers hold user mailboxes. On ISA2006 I have used OWA publishing rule forwarding all request to Exch1/exchange. Internally (LAN), users having their mailbox on Exch2 can access their mailbox through this URL: http://exch1/exchange/<username>. Exch1 redirects to Exch2 for respective mailboxes. However, when users from Exch2 try to access from external network (Home / via internet), they are unable to.

I tried to create another OWA publishing rule which directs request to Exch2/exchange but it doesn't work. Is there any other way I can configure this?

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: OWA 2003 Publishing - 19.May2008 11:04:09 AM

tshinder

Posts: 47490
Joined: 10.Jan.2001
From: Texas
Status: offline

I'm no Exchange Pro, but isn't this what FE servers are for? To route connections to the correct Exchange Mailbox server?

Tom

_____________________________

Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Sr. Consultant/Technical Writer
Prowess Consulting http://www.prowessconsulting.com/
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/

GET THE NEW ISA 2006 Book!: http://tinyurl.com/2gpoo8

(in reply to shraneel)

Post #: 2

RE: OWA 2003 Publishing - 20.May2008 7:54:30 AM

Christoph37

Posts: 9
Joined: 13.Mar.2006
Status: offline

Yes, this is exactly what FE Exchange Servers do. However, they should be configured as such. And Shraneel did not tell us, whether this is the case.

@Shraneel:
It can be configured on the properties dialogs of the respective Exchange Servers.

Maybe you should also run the Exchange Best Practice Analyzer to check for problems in your deployment.

Best regards

Christoph

(in reply to tshinder)

Post #: 3