Welcome to ISAserver.org

Where to download NAT-T update, or any alternatives to SP2?

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [ISA Server 2004 Firewall] >> VPN >> Where to download NAT-T update, or any alternatives to SP2?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Where to download NAT-T update, or any alternatives to ... - 9.May2005 5:33:00 PM

S_J_D

Posts: 2
Joined: 6.May2005
Status: offline

Hi,

New user here. We've got a problem we've isolated to the fact that the VPN client we're trying to connect to our ISA 2004 box is behind a NAT device. The setup is as follows:

ISA 2004 SP1 (on Windows 2003 SP1) (Public routable IP on External interface)
|
|
|
Internet
|
|
|
NAT Router
|
|
|
Client (XP SP1 - trying to connect using L2TP)

Installing SP2 on the clients isn't an option as it's yet to go through our testing, and will probably break other things on our standard desktop build. I see MS used to offer a NAT-T patch, but that's now been withdrawn? Is there anywhere I can download that patch from, or failing that is there a 3rd party alternative VPN client that I can use that is L2TP capable?

Many thanks,

Simon.

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: Where to download NAT-T update, or any alternatives... - 9.May2005 10:40:00 PM

ClintD

Posts: 1833
Joined: 26.Jan.2001
From: Keller, TX
Status: offline

This one is a pain in the ass to find.

Go to the Windows Update Catalog.

<Deep breath>

1. Hit the option for Find Updates for Microsoft Windows operating systems
2. From the Operating Systems list, select Windows XP SP1 only - do not choose any other option or this will fail
3. Hit the link for Advanced Search Options and in the Contains these words line, enter 818043 and then select Search

In the results screen, you should have one hit under Recommended Updates and this should be listed there.

I had this saved in a Word doc so sorry for the Windows Update 101 stuff - I just ran through it and the fix was listed there.

[ May 09, 2005, 10:41 PM: Message edited by: ClintD ]

(in reply to S_J_D)

Post #: 2