Welcome to ISAserver.org

which way is more effective

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [ISA Server 2000 Misc.] >> Tips & Tricks >> which way is more effective

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

which way is more effective - 12.Apr.2006 8:16:16 PM

cableguy

Posts: 2
Joined: 20.Mar.2006
Status: offline

Hi.

I wanted to know which way is more effective when you make a certain destinantion set in order to use it for allow/deny site and content rule or a routing rule.For example if I want to block a site "www.abc.com" should i specify the complete URL as www. abc.com or " abc.com " or " *.abc.com" becuase I've noticed that if i've blocked abc.com then ISA only blocks http://abc.com and allows http://www.abs.com and vice versa. And if I make a destination set for yahoo.com to use in routing rule will ISA only allow www.yahoo.com or any subdomain ending at yahoo.com like groups.yahoo.com or movies.yahoo.com. Same for content groups. whats more effective defining only exe or *. exe.