Welcome to ISAserver.org

WAP Vs ISA

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [ISA Server 2004 General ] >> General >> WAP Vs ISA

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

WAP Vs ISA - 12.Apr.2016 10:04:15 AM

excossack

Posts: 43
Joined: 14.Jun.2005
Status: offline

Hi all.

As ISA is no more and has been for a while time to look at a replacement for our ISA2004 setup.

One suggestion has been to use Web Application Proxy on premise to do this.

Has anyone got any thoughts on WAP vs ISA ?

Currently we use ISA 2004 Enterprise with Windows NLB for publishing websites such as OWA with RSA authentication (which might change when we are fully 0365), but a majority of the websites published are just standard websites with authentication handled by the website vendors. (Such as access to the Pension, HR, Project management websites) and other hosted websites are pages required by our planning website, internet facing website (*.ourdomain.org) with no authentication. i.e publically accessible ones.

Most of my reading appears to suggest the uses for WAP are for publishing the likes of Lync, OWA, Sharepoint, RDS etc which require authentication rather than standard websites that are unauthenticated access.

On ISA we have around 40 publishing/Listening rules

Wildcard SSL certificates. (*.ourdomain.org)
HTTP > HTTPS redirection rules
Rules to redirect traffic from port 443 to custom ports i.e 30600 for DMZ based web servers.
Rule to allow HTTPS traffic to pass thru for servers that have their own SSL certificates installed directly.
Forwarding of Host Headers � for multiple sites that are hosted on one server but accessed via a single IP address
Publishing of OWA
Publishing of OMA

The two ISA servers have two NICs, one in the DMZ (192.xxx.xxx.xxx) and one on another network (10.xxx.xxx.xx)

< Message edited by excossack -- 12.Apr.2016 10:11:40 AM >

_____________________________

Thanks.
John.
Wirral, UK