Welcome to ISAserver.org
Forums |
Register |
Login |
My Profile |
Inbox |
RSS
|
My Subscription |
My Forums |
Address Book |
Member List |
Search |
FAQ |
Ticket List |
Log Out
RE: User defined protocols
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
Login | |
|
RE: User defined protocols - 20.Feb.2004 12:35:00 AM
|
|
|
Persing
Posts: 40
Joined: 31.Jan.2004
Status: offline
|
Hi Lex, In your last message you said: "The strange thing is that while analyzing the unidentified IP traffic , I couldn't find any unidentified IP traffic in our sniffer ( Sniffer Pro ) It was 100% http/https traffic , yet ISA sees half of these packets as unidentified and thus blocks them as a default rule. btw : Our problem is easily reproduceable by setting your proxy on in ISA and sending a client to windowsupdate.microsoft.com When clicking scan my computer ( https module ) the ISA will see unidentified traffic."
And all I can say to that is: YES, YES, YES, EXACTLY! Thank you very much Lex for grabbing this in your teeth, sniffin the traffic, carrying the flame to Redmond, and getting an answer from MSFT. I feel that all this is going in the right direction. When this product finally goes gold I want to be able to turn off logging for the rules where I expect to see a lot of legitimate traffic, and know that I can identify the remaining entries in the log and understand why they are there. If I create a new rule I want to be able to see the effect, and being able to understand and rely on the log is the only (reasonable) way to do that. Thanks again (yea!).
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|