adonald
Posts: 7
Joined: 10.Sep.2007
Status: offline
|
Hi, I have a question about access rules/logging. I have setup the following 3 test access rules - The user i am logged in as is not a member of group1, but is a member of group2. rule group1 1. allow, http/https protocol, internal, external, group1, all content rule group2 2. allow, http/https protocol, internal, access, group2, all content rule default rule 3, deny, all, all traffic, all networks, all networks, all users, all content In the log, i see the following entries (i've stripped out the irrelevant stuff) - clientusername, result code, protocol, desthost, rule anonymous, 407, http, www.google.com, group1 anonymous, 407, http, www.google.com, group1 domain\user, 200, http, www.google.com, group2. The process behind the proxy authentication is correct and the ruleset IS being applied correctly, however the log (and i guess the decision making in ISA) looks incorrect. Is the above actually correct, or should i see the following in the log - anonymous, 407, http, www.google.com, default rule anonymous, 407, http, www.google.com, default rule domain\user, 200, http, www.google.com, group 2 Note that the 'rule' that allows the user according to ISA server is group1, but this user is not a member of this group. Only group2. The access rules do work as expected , eg, if i change rule 2 to deny, the user will be denied internet access based on it. If i remove rule1, the log looks as i've written in the suggested logs.. eg, 2 anonymous entries denied by the default rule, but after authentication the group2 rule is in effect. Am i just reading this wrong? thanks for any help.
< Message edited by adonald -- 17.Sep.2007 1:33:07 AM >
|